Case study submitted by: Felicity Rackham / Liz Meakin, Clinical Nurse Consultants, Stomal Therapy, Epworth Eastern Hospital, Australia
4 reasons to use:
Choosing the correct appliance is an important aspect in a person’s overall recovery after ostomy surgery.1
The goal of both nurse and patient is to achieve a predictable, reliable wear time.2
Parastomal hernias are one of the most common complications reported by ostomates.3 Occurance ranges from 25 to 50 %.4
Postoperative recovery is not always straightforward with some ostomates requiring change of product due to post operative pain and wound management.
Patient History:
Mrs A – 73 year old female underwent a large paracolostomy hernia repair
This lady was keen to use her previous 2-piece convex system after the repair surgery as it was familiar and comfortable
Problems:
Persistent discomfort on the lateral left side of the stoma, suggesting the convexity was placing pressure on the internal mesh
Leakage due to the uneven plane of her refashioned stoma
Nurse review:
Skin damage around the stoma
Mild bruising and fragile skin at 3 o’clock from the convex flange
Signs of medical adhesive removal skin injury (MARSI) along the flange edges due to frequent changes of appliance
Nurse recommends eakin dot 2-piece:
Less pain and bruising on the lateral mesh side Mrs A felt comfortable managing this system at home
Outcome:
2 weeks after using eakin dot® 2-piece with seal under base plate, Mrs A reported the skin as feeling much better
The skin continued to heal over the next few weeks
Clinical evidence for choosing eakin Cohesive® seals:
Improves peristomal skin problems
Ease of use
hydrocolloid for longer-life wear
Meets the individual needs of ostomates
References
Williams J, Gwillian B, Sutherland N, Matten J, Hemmingway J, Ilsey H et al (2010) Evaluating skin problems in people with stomas. BJN 19(17): s6-15
Wound, Ostomy, Continence Nurses Society(WOCN). (2013) Colostomy and Ileostomy: Products and tips. Mt. Laurel, NJ: WOCN
Burch J, 2018 Nursing strategies for the prevention and management of parastomal hernias. Gastrointestinal Nursing 16(2) 38-42
Thompson MJ, Trainor B (2005) Incidence of parastomal hernia before and after a prevention programme 3(2):23-27
This website uses cookies to improve your experience and for analytics . By clicking accept you agree to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more Review cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Please review our Cookie Policy for full details on which cookies we use.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.